|
The article analyzes the issue of innate knowledge in modern philosophy, examines the main theoretical and methodological approaches in the teachings of N. Chomsky, M. Baker, E. Sepir, J. Worf, R. Dawkins, G. Follmer, as well as modern logic and linguistics. The author defends the idea that the concept of innate knowledge in the context of realism is relevant, since it includes a single structure for the formation and use of language, representing its universal character, accessible to any person.
Innate knowledge in the realistic concept is characterized by schemas, general algorithms of cognition, which contributes to the formation of true knowledge and understanding between interlocutors in the process of dialogue. In contrast, in the framework of the anti-realistic approach, the process of understanding knowledge depends on the rules of dialogue that facilitate communication between interlocutors. Thus, knowledge is formed and changes depending on the time and place of the language implementation. This theory is significantly inferior to the first one, since it constantly interprets knowledge at a new stage of its development. Based on this, mistakes and misunderstandings may occur in the process of learning and knowledge transfer between people.
Keywords:innate knowledge, understanding, interpretation, communication, dialogue, theoretical and methodological approaches, realism, anti-realism, universal grammar
|